Skip to main content

Albania Remains Hostage to its Communist Past

This March marked the 30th anniversary of the first multi-party elections in Albania that followed the fall of the communist regime, which, according to Neil Kritz, researcher at the American Institute for Peace, was one of the most tightly closed regimes in the world.

For about half-a-century, this brutal regime built and ruled through the State Security Service, known as the Sigurimi in Albanian, one of the most oppressive secret police apparatuses in the world. By the late 1980s, it is estimated to have recruited tens of thousands of people, while more than one third of the total population formed part of its extensive information network.

Under the leadership of the communist elite, the Sigurimi is estimated to have executed more than 6,000 people, investigated, persecuted, imprisoned for life and interned in inhumane prisons and camps thousands more, while instilling fear in every corner of Albania. This half-century-long regime transformed Albania into a massive detention camp.

That’s why, in the beginning of the 1990s Albania had all political and historical credentials to pursue a radical and transformative model in dealing with its communist criminal past.

Ruti Teitel, a leading expert on transitional justice, asserts that condemning the crimes of totalitarian regimes, establishing justice, uncovering the truth, and acknowledging human rights abuses is an important precondition for reconciliation and the rapid transition of a post-totalitarian society towards a functioning democracy.

However, 30 years on, despite all the hopes of the people who poured onto the streets of Tirana in the cold days of December 1990, Albania is the only country behind the former Iron Curtain in Europe that has not managed to break away from its criminal, communist past.

Unlike most other former communist countries in Central and Eastern Europe, even though Albania initiated several legal measures aimed at uncovering and punishing communist-era human rights abuses, it has failed to implement them altogether.

Cynthia Horne, a transitional justice scholar, in her book Building Trust and Democracy, writes that Albania is the only country in former communist Eastern Europe that has such laws on its books, but failed to put them into practice.

This failure is down to a combination of factors.

First, the transition from Enver Hoxha’s dictatorship to political pluralism in Albania fits into what Samuel Huntington called “the negotiation and power transfer” transition model.

In the late-1980s, Albania was the only former communist country in Europe that did not have organised political dissidents. This was mainly due to the regime’s brutality; it killed or imprisoned for life both the intellectual elite and religious clergy.

In such circumstances, when the anti-communist revolution swept Eastern Europe and finally reached Albania at the beginning of the1990s, it was practically impossible to cleanse the communist nomenclature from power.

As a result, the new political elite of the 1990s had to coexist and share power with the communist regime’s human political legacy in the public administration, judiciary and party politics.

It is this assemblage that has prevented Albania from making a clean break with the past. For instance, the introduction of the Genocide Law in 1995, intended to hold human rights abusers to account, was amended by the Socialist majority, the successors to the old communist party, when they took power in 1997. Shortly afterwards, in 1999, the law was completely overturned by the Constitutional Court.

Secondly, most of the legal measures introduced in post-communist Albania were poorly drafted and half-hearted. The first court sentences imposed on the former communist nomenclature for economic abuses discredited the reputation of the whole process.

Parts of the legislation were seen as politically motivated, intended mainly to eliminate political opponents; this weakened bipartisan support for these legal initiatives. The combination of the politics of the past with the politics of the present in post-communist Albania turned the hoped-for-reckoning with the past into a futile enterprise.

This communist past continues to haunt Albanian society. The failure to cleanse state institutions of the people who served the oppressive machinery of the communist regime facilitated the continuation of the totalitarian regime’s elite. Some of the highest political and legal institutions are still run by former protégés of the former regime.

Albania’s inability to expose the abuses of its totalitarian regime and establish justice has also led to the downplaying and denial of the old dictatorship’s human rights abuses.

This has nurtured a distorted historical narrative in the public sphere, which keeps portraying communist Albania in schoolbooks as a progressive state, which ensured electrification, provided free health care and education as well as universal suffrage (the right to vote only for the ruling party) – overshadowing the crimes, economic and social misery it brought about to the country. Keeping this narrative alive has made it impossible to build a unifying collective memory of the communist past in Albania.

Lastly, Albania’s failure to reckon with the communist regime’s human rights abuses has had serious consequences for its democratic direction. The controversial past has been harnessed politically to manipulate the public discourse with anti-political rhetoric for electoral benefits, and to excuse misconduct in office, corruption and bad governance.

Three decades on, Albania continues to float in a protracted transition to nowhere, still hostage to the ghosts of its communist past that haunt the present – and its future.

Altin Gjeta holds a Master of Arts in International Relations and Politics from the University of Westminster, London. He is a research fellow at the Albanian Centre for Good Governance, a Tirana-based NGO.

The opinions expressed are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of BIRN.https://balkaninsight.com/2021/05/21/albania-remains-hostage-to-its-communist-past/?fbclid=IwAR0DsWe8w0iQeb3is5XO6zs9aa5-OkApdurWLPmVTwLAnRBwhjS1q0oVSPA

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A do të na shpëtojnë intelektualët?

Historiani britanik Naill Ferguson zbuloi në një studim se inteligjenca gjermane, veçanërisht bota universitare ishte shtresa që e përqafoi dhe mbështeti ngritjen e Nacional Socializmit të Hitlerit duke i dhënë finesë diskursit të vrazhdë të partisë. Filozofi gjerman Martin Heidegger, thotë Ferguson, mbeti besnik i Nazizmit deri në vitin 1945, në një kohë kur universitetet gjermane në vitet 1930-të ishin për nga cilësia si të thuash njëjtë me prestigjin që kanë sot Grupi Russell apo Liga Ivy në Britani dhe SHBA. Pra, intelektualët kanë një prirje siç duket profesionale për tu bërë pjesë e strukturave sunduese. Kjo ndodh përgjithësisht për dy arsye. Së pari, intelektualët ose siç Thomas Sowell i quan 'the anointed' presupozojnë se për shkak të titujve dhe gjuhës që zotërojnë kanë të drejtë hyjnore të kenë rol përcaktues në vendimarrjen politike. Së dyti, ato kanë prirje të qëndrojnë larg rrisqeve që paraqet sipërmarrja private, prandaj pushteti është strehë e natyrshme e tyre. P...

Pasjeta (vazhdimësia) e regjimit komunist në Shqipëri: Nevoja për tu përballur me të vërtetën

Jemi mësur në këto tre dekada që në hapësirën publike të flitet për rrëzim të regjimit komunist, Shqipëri post-komuniste ose pluralizm politik. Kjo narrativë bëhet ma shurdhuese në data të caktuara me q ë llim imponimin e një të ‘vërtete’ në kujtesën tonë kolektive. Pra, historia jo vetëm tentohet të shkruhet dhe rishkruhet sipas lenteve të njerëzve të interesuar, por paraqitet në formë lineare si ndarje epokash që ndjekin njëra-tjetrën në mënyrë kronologjike dhe pa lidhje shkakësore. Qëllimi i kësaj ndërmarrje larjetruri është për të ndërtuar imazhin e diskontinuitetit (thyerje epokash) mes regjimit komunist dhe Shqipërisë post. Prandaj historia politike plazomhet si periudhë ndarjesh kohore në përpara dhe pas – si kalim në një sistem tjetër politik me sjellje, kulturë dhe kushte materiale totalitare të vdekura. Ky diskurs regjim/post-regjim është prezent dhe dominues në rrethet e klasës politike, një pjesë të mirë të botës akademike, medias, në shkolla, familje dhe shoqëri. Por,...

KUR PD TAKON ELEFANTIN

Si të kuptosh trupin politik? Objektivi kryesor i partive politike është të fitojnë zgjedhjet dhe qeverisin. Vetëm kjo do t'i mundësojë një organizmi politik të vendosë në jetë programin elektoral, mbështesë shtresat shoqërore që përfaqëson dhe të sjellë trofe politik tek mbështetësit. Pra, partitë politike duhet të shmangin me çdo kusht humbjen e zgjedhjeve. Sigurisht shkalla e humbjes varion: çfarë është humbje, për shembull për një parti nuk është për një tjetër. Nëse merr pjesë për herë të parë në zgjedhje, fitimi i disa ulësve në parlament është fitore. Por nëse je një nga partitë krysore të sistemit politik dalja apo qëndrimi në opozitë është padyshim disfatë elektorale. Humbja e zgjedhjeve nga Partia Konservatore në Britani, Partia Demokratike në SHBA dhe së fundi nga Social-Demokratët në Gjermani përbën një moment thyrje në jetën politike të këtyre partive. Humbja shoqërohet me kriza të brendshme, avullim të fondeve si pasojë e largimit të donatorëve, zhgënjim dhe largim ...